RTX 4000 vs 3000 Series With Benchmark Points for All GPUs.

We’ve all stood at a crossroads, our money in hand, trying to choose the best GPU. We want something that’s great for gaming, work, and is worth its cost. Buying a graphic card is like investing in our fun and creativity. These cards are key to getting top performance from our games or work tasks.

This article will compare the RTX 4000 and RTX 3000 GPUs in detail. We’ll use benchmark tests and other comparisons to show you how they do. Whether you’re looking to get 120 fps in the newest games at 1080p or a steady 60 fps at 1440p with a specific CPU, we’ve got your back. The RTX 4000 beats the RTX 3000 Mobile by 52% in overall tests¹. And, in the value category, the RTX 4000 is an amazing 346% better than the RTX 3000 Mobile¹.

Also, we will explore what each GPU offers for different screen resolutions, like 1440p, 4k, and even 8k gaming. We aim to present you with facts to help in your GPU purchase. The RTX 4000 shines with a 39.82 score for performance, leaving the RTX 3000 Mobile, with a 26.17 score, behind¹.

This info should help you make a smart choice for your next GPU.

Key Takeaways

• The RTX 4000 outperforms RTX 3000 Mobile by 52% on aggregate benchmarks¹.
• RTX 4000 offers a 42.9% to 47.7% higher FPS in Full HD and 4K gaming resolutions compared to RTX 3000 Mobile¹.
• RTX 4000 has 8 GB of GDDR6 VRAM with a 256-bit memory bus, enhancing its efficiency and speed¹.
• The RTX 4000 is ranked significantly higher in performance ranking compared to RTX 3000 Mobile¹.
• When considering value for money, the RTX 4000 substantially outperforms the RTX 3000 Mobile¹.

Introduction to the RTX 4000 and 3000 Series

The RTX 4000 and RTX 3000 series are top-notch in the GPU world. Their specs and performance are outstanding. The release of the RTX 4000 was a big step forward, using new tech that outdid the older RTX GPUs. The RTX 3000 series has a wide range of prices, compared to the newer RTX 4000 models.

The RTX 4070 Super boosts the CUDA cores by 20% and runs faster than the RTX 3090, needing less power. It shows how much the tech has improved from one series to the next². Priced at $599 like the RTX 4070, it’s a great choice for gamers and pros².

The RTX 3000 GPUs did well in the market. But the RTX 4000 series brought big upgrades. The RTX 4090, for example, has an amazing 16,384 CUDA cores and uses 450W of power. It sets a new bar for high-end graphics³.

The RTX 4070 Super did 16% better than the RTX 4070 in game tests at 1440p². These tests help compare RTX 4000 and RTX 3000 cards. The RTX 4070 Super did 1440p ray tracing at 109 FPS, matching up with AMD’s best².

The RTX 4000 series has changed what we expect from GPUs. It’s not just about power; these cards manage heat and power use well. The RTX 4090, for one, has more CUDA and ray tracing cores, plus more tensor cores³.

To sum up, the move from RTX 3000 to RTX 4000 series is a win for gamers and pros. They offer better performance and savings. This shows how GPU tech and performance have quickly gotten better in recent years.

GPU Architecture and Technology

In the world of GPU architecture, NVIDIA’s RTX 4000 and 3000 series are big leaps. We’re diving into what makes the Turing architecture and ray tracing special in the RTX 4000 and 3000 series.

Turing Architecture

The Turing architecture, used in the RTX 4000 and 3000 series, changed the game. It brought real-time ray tracing to life, improving how games and professional software look. The RTX 4000 series delivers up to 52% better performance than the RTX 3000 Mobile¹. Also, its core clock speed is 60 MHz faster¹.

Moreover, the RTX 4000 has 2,560 CUDA cores, more than the 1,920 in the RTX 3000 Mobile⁴. This means it can handle more tasks at once, making it better for games and work.

Ray Tracing Capabilities

The RTX 4000 series is top-notch in ray tracing. It has more cores for better lighting and shadows. The RTX 4090 has 144 ray tracing cores, allowing for super realistic effects³. In comparison, the RTX 4080 and RTX 4070 Ti have 76 and 60 ray tracing cores³, which suits different needs.

These improved ray tracing features boost gaming at higher resolutions. In 4K, the RTX 4000 can hit 130-140 FPS, which is 47.7% better than the RTX 3000 Mobile¹.

Enhanced ray tracing isn’t just for gaming; it’s changing how pros make and show visuals. Diving into the RTX 4000 series, its ray tracing clearly beats the RTX 3000 series, ideal for top performance seekers.

Market Segmentation and Use Cases

Market segmentation helps us see the wide range of uses for GPUs, whether for work or play. When we look at how GPUs perform in games and for work tasks, we see clear differences.

Workstation vs. Gaming

Workstation GPUs, like NVIDIA’s RTX 4090, focus on powerful computing for work. They have many CUDA and Tensor cores to boost tasks like deep learning and rendering. This makes them great for work needing a lot of power³. The RTX 4090, for example, stands out with its 16,384 CUDA cores and 576 Tensor cores. In work tasks, it beats gaming GPUs easily³. Gaming-wise, GPUs designed for high-quality gaming shine. The RTX 4070 Ti, for example, is great for 4K gaming because of its special memory features. This way, each kind of GPU is made for its best use, work or play.

Mobile vs. Desktop Performance

The performance of mobile and desktop GPUs is also quite different. Desktop GPUs, like the RTX 4000s, usually have faster speeds but use more power. Take the RTX 4090, for example, it can use up to 450W of power. Mobile GPUs, on the other hand, focus on saving power³⁵. They also have fewer CUDA and Tensor cores because they need to stay cool in smaller spaces⁵. For core counts, mobile GPUs vary from 3,072 to 18,176, showing a big range⁵. The choice between desktop and mobile GPUs depends on your needs, whether it’s for gaming on a big screen or doing tasks on the go.

Understanding GPU segmentation can help users pick the right one. Whether it’s for powerful work, high-quality gaming, or if you need to balance power and efficiency, knowing your options is key.

Performance Analysis: Synthetic Benchmarks

Looking at GPUs with synthetic benchmarks gives us key info on their performance. The RTX 4000 series shows big steps forward from older models. This is seen clearly in Passmark scores and overall benchmark results.

Passmark Scores

In Passmark tests, the RTX 4000 series beats the RTX 3000 Mobile by a big 52%¹. This data highlights the new RTX 4000’s better efficiency and power. The RTX 4000 scored 39.82, while the RTX 3000 Mobile got a 26.17. This shows a big jump in power¹.

Combined Synthetic Benchmark Scores

For combined benchmarks, the RTX 4000 tops the RTX 3000 Mobile by 26%⁴. This makes it a stronger choice for advanced tasks. Also, the value analysis shows the RTX 4000 is 346% better value than the RTX 3000 Mobile¹. It’s a smart upgrade for those wanting more power without a high cost.

In RAM, the RTX 4000 has 8 GB, while the RTX 3000 Mobile only has 6 GB¹. This means better performance for heavy tasks and games. More memory is key for those who need to use their GPU for big jobs or gaming in high resolution.

Power use data is fascinating too. The RTX 4000 uses 160 Watts, twice as much as the RTX 3000 Mobile’s 80 Watts¹. Yet, the RTX 4000’s bigger power use is alright because of its increased performance power.

For gaming, the RTX 4000 Mobile is better at 1080p, 16% faster than the RTX 3000 Mobile⁴. At 4K, the RTX 4000 offers 130-140 FPS, while the RTX 3000 Mobile gives 88 FPS. This means a 47.7% boost in power for the RTX 4000¹. Still, the RTX 3000 Mobile is 76% faster in some 4K gaming situations⁴.

Synthetic benchmarks clearly show the RTX 4000 series is a major upgrade from the RTX 3000 series. This is especially true for Passmark and combined scores. These tests make the case for the RTX 4000 series as a top pick for those wanting better performance and value.

Gaming Benchmarks: RTX 4000 vs RTX 3000

When we look at GPU gaming benchmarks, the RTX 4000 series often does better than the RTX 3000 series. It shows superior performance in many gaming situations. This study looks at how well each GPU manages top games, showing differences in average and best FPS.

Average FPS in Popular Games

The RTX 4000 series beats the RTX 3000 series by 26% in average FPS, as shown by many test results⁴. For instance, the average FPS for the Quadro RTX 4000 stands at 130-140 in Full HD and 4K. In comparison, the RTX 3000 Mobile gets 91 FPS in Full HD and 88 FPS in 4K¹. This big difference means smoother and more captivating gameplay.

Minimum FPS for Optimal Performance

It’s crucial to hit optimal FPS to avoid gaming interruptions. The RTX 4000 Mobile is ahead by 16% in 1080p and 30% in 1440p over the RTX 3000 Mobile⁴. But, in 4K gaming, the RTX 3000 Mobile does 76% better than the RTX 4000 Mobile⁴. This makes the RTX 3000 series good for gamers who want to play in 4K.

In 72 gaming tests, the RTX 4000 series outpaces the RTX 3000 series. It proves its better in GPU gaming benchmarks⁴. With many games tried, these results say the RTX 4000 boosts average FPS well. This makes games more enjoyable across the board.

VRAM Capacity and Performance

It’s key to look at VRAM capacity when choosing a graphics card. The RTX 4000 and RTX 3000 series have big VRAM sizes for different uses. This is true for gaming and professional work.

Memory Type and Size

The RTX 4000 series has better memory compared to the RTX 3000. For example, the RTX 4090 has 24GB of GDDR6X memory. It’s great for tough tasks and playing games way into the future³. The RTX 4080 and RTX 4070 Ti also have good memory. They provide 16GB and 12GB of GDDR6X memory, making them work well at 4K and even 8K resolutions³. But older models like the RTX 3080, while they have GDDR6X, don’t have as much memory which might slow them down in heavy applications.

Memory Bandwidth and Speed

The RTX 4000 series is also a leader in memory bandwidth and speed. For example, the RTX 4090 has a memory speed of 21 Gbps. It offers a bandwidth of 1,008 GBps, which is impressive for heavy-load tasks³. The RTX 4080 and RTX 4070 Ti are not far behind. They have speeds of 21 Gbps and bandwidths of 912 GBps and 504 GBps, which are still very good³. These advances in speed and bandwidth help games run smoother and videos render faster. They make overall GPU performance better than the RTX 3000 series.

Comparing them, the improvements in the RTX 4000 series are clear. They aid both in games and work projects. If you want to improve your memory size or get better performance, the RTX 4000 series has what you need for tough tasks.

Power Consumption and Efficiency

It’s key to look at power use and efficiency when comparing the RTX 4000 and 3000 series GPUs. Both have improved in terms of performance. But, they have very different power use and efficiency levels.

Power Consumption Ratings

The RTX 4000 Series GPU uses 250W, a bit more than the RTX 3000 Series’ 220W⁶. This means a 10% rise in power use over the RTX 3000⁶. When we focus on specific models, the RTX 4090 burdens 450W, much more than the RTX 4080’s 320W and the RTX 4070 Ti’s 285W³. This change shows why it’s crucial to check power ratings of both series under different conditions.

Efficiency and Thermal Performance

The RTX 3000 Series is more efficient with 1.5 performance per watt. In comparison, the RTX 4000 Series rates at 1.2 performance per watt⁶. So, the RTX 3000 Series is better at using power to perform well. Testing shows the RTX 4000 Series gets an average of 85 FPS versus the RTX 3000 Series’ 78 FPS⁶. Also, the RTX 3000 Series manages heat better. Knowing about TDP ratings and efficiency is crucial for those who want to manage energy and performance.

Cost-Effectiveness and Value for Money

The RTX 4000 and RTX 3000 series compete strongly when it comes to cost-effectiveness. The RTX 4000 Mobile offers 18% better value than the RTX 3000 Mobile⁴. This is because it has newer technology and much better gaming at all resolution levels.

Performance to Price Ratio

The RTX 4000 Mobile stands out in the performance to price comparison. Its evaluation is 7.38, beating the RTX 3000 Mobile’s 6.24⁴. It’s also 52% better in benchmark tests¹. The RTX 4000 Mobile visibly holds a top spot for value-for-money GPUs.

Current Market Prices

Looking at today’s GPU prices, the RTX 4000 costs $974, which is much less than the RTX 3000 Mobile at $2393¹. This lower price makes the RTX 4000 more attractive for budget-conscious buyers. It also receives better overall user ratings, with a 4.2 versus the RTX 3000 Mobile’s 3.5¹.

The RTX 4000 uses twice as much power as the RTX 3000 Mobile, with 160 Watts versus 80 Watts. Yet, the big boost in performance often makes up for this higher power use¹. Taking into account performance, price, and current market costs, the RTX 4000 series, especially the RTX 4070 Ti, offers a smart mix of value and advanced features³.

Connectivity and Outputs

When checking out GPU connectivity, remember to look at the RTX 4000 and RTX 3000 series. Each has its own set of display connectors, outputs, and extra features. They both support USB Type-C, which helps you connect to modern monitors and VR headsets easily.

The RTX 4000 and RTX 3000 series both have DisplayPort, which helps connect to many displays. The RTX 4000 is 52% faster in Full HD and 4K gaming than the RTX 3000 Mobile¹. This makes it great for gamers who want the best visuals and performance. The RTX 4000 Mobile is ready for G-SYNC and VR, offering a smoother and more exciting gaming experience⁴.

The RTX 4000 has more VRAM, with 8 GB compared to the RTX 3000 Mobile’s 6 GB¹. This means it can handle memory-heavy tasks better. Also, it has more CUDA cores, boosting its performance in a variety of applications and games⁴.

Power use is key too. The RTX 4000 uses 160 watts, while the RTX 3000 Mobile uses 80 watts¹. This means it’s more powering, but also less energy efficient. Still, the RTX 4000 offers more features and is more future-ready for gamers looking to improve their setups.

Both series have HDMI 2.1 for better gaming and media experiences. The RTX 4000 Mobile has a higher texture fill rate, showing its stronger processing power than the RTX 3000 Mobile⁴.

The RTX 4000 series brings big improvements in GPU connectivity and display options. It is a top choice in the GPU market, with key features and strong performance metrics. This proves why the RTX 4000 is a leader in its field.

Supported Technologies

The RTX 4000 and RTX 3000 series support many advanced technologies. This makes them great for lots of different uses. Notably, DirectX and Vulkan help improve gaming and make graphics better. They’re both ready for VR, leading to fun and immersive experiences.

For math-heavy tasks, CUDA and OpenCL are key. The RTX 4000 series has more CUDA cores, 2304, than the RTX 3000’s 1920. This means it can handle more tasks at once. It’s a big help for people doing tough simulations and heavy math work¹.

What’s cool is that both series work well with various APIs like DirectX, Vulkan, and OpenCL. These APIs let developers make their apps run better on different devices without slowing them down. This makes the RTX 4000 and 3000 series great for gaming and professional tasks.

Also, the RTX 4000 series is made using TSMC’s 4nm process node. It has better RT Cores for sharper ray tracing and DLSS for smoother graphics³. This means playing games at high quality is more fluid and enjoyable.

The RTX 4000 series stands out for VR too. It has better FPS and VR support, beating the RTX 3000 series by 76% in 4K gaming performance⁴. This leads to a smoother and more engaging VR gameplay. It’s great news for VR fans.

In short, the RTX 4000 and 3000 series offer a lot with their supported technologies. They’re flexible, powerful, and great for many tasks. With better VR abilities and stronger math processing, the RTX 4000 series is the top choice. It offers more value and performance than the RTX 3000 series.

API Compatibility

The RTX 4000 and RTX 3000 series aim to gel with many APIs. This ensures both developers and gamers get the most from new tech. These series rock with DirectX 12 Ultimate, upping the game with better ray tracing, varying shading rates, and mesh shaders.

They also dance well with Shader Model 6.6 for enhanced, smarter shaders. And their OpenGL game is strong, fitting for a wide app range. They offer smooth ops on various platforms.

The RTX 4090 makes a big leap with 83 Shader-TFLOPS and 191 RT-TFLOPS, improving core shader and ray tracing by up to 180% over the RTX 3090⁷. This power boost suits apps hungry for quick shader work and on-the-fly ray tracing.

These new graphics API feats are joined by top-notch memory skills in the RTX 4090. It reaches over 1 TB/s memory bandwidth with 24 GB GDDR6X. This supercharges data handling and allows for bigger, more detailed graphics tasks without slow-downs.

Both GPU series go all-in with various OpenGL versions, ensuring wide software compatibility. This flexibility suits lots of dev needs, from gaming to pro work smoothly.

Quick check on the key API features of the RTX 4000 and 3000 series:

API compatibility is key for the RTX 4000 and 3000 series. They excel from DirectX 12 Ultimate to Shader Model 6.6 and OpenGL. Users can tap into top-tier GPU tech for amazing graphics and computations.

Detailed Specifications Comparison

The RTX 4000 and RTX 3000 series GPUs are different in several key ways. For example, the RTX 4000 has 8 GB of GDDR6 VRAM, while the RTX 3000 Mobile has 6 GB¹. The RTX 4000 also has more CUDA cores, with 2304 compared to the RTX 3000 Mobile’s 1920¹.

Moreover, these GPUs vary in their clock speeds too. The RTX 4000 operates at 1005 MHz base and 1545 MHz boost speeds. The RTX 3000 Mobile’s clock speeds are slightly lower, at 945 MHz and 1380 MHz, respectively¹. Despite utilizing the same Turing architecture, the RTX 4000 is designed for better performance.

Looking at texture fill rates highlights more differences. The Quadro RTX 4000 uses 160 Watts, twice the power of the RTX 3000 Mobile at 80 Watts¹. This extra power means the RTX 4000 can handle textures better and perform at a higher overall level.

Here’s a table breaking down the detailed specs:

In game benchmarks, the RTX 4000 outperformed the RTX 3000 Mobile by nearly 43% at Full HD and almost 48% at 4K¹. This shows how the RTX 4000 shines in high-resolution gaming, marking a significant performance gap.

RTX 4000 Series vs RTX 3000 Series with Benchmark Points for All GPU

The RTX 4000 series and RTX 3000 series show distinct differences in GPU performance. The RTX 4000 Series GPUs performed roughly 7% better than the RTX 3000 Series⁶. In AAA game titles, the newer series ran about 15 FPS faster⁶.

In rendering complex 3D visuals, the RTX 3000 Series managed a 2% advantage⁶. This means they are better for certain detailed tasks. Reviews show the RTX 4000 Series at 4.5/5, a bit higher than the RTX 3000 Series’ 4.2/5⁶.

The RTX 4090 stands out with 16384 CUDA cores. This is much higher than the RTX 4080 and RTX 4070 Ti. In ray tracing, the RTX 4090 also excels with 144 RT cores³. These features significantly boost its benchmark performance.

The RTX 3090 surpasses the RTX 3080 in various tasks by up to 2x⁸. It also shines in 3D rendering with V-Ray and Octane benchmarks⁸. These are key areas for professionals needing top-notch GPU performance for their tasks.

When it comes to efficiency, the RTX 4000 Series performed 10% better than the RTX 3000 Series⁶. Yet, they are priced about 15% higher. This shows a trade-off between performance and cost⁶.

In summary, the RTX 4000 series brings better benchmarks and efficiency. However, the RTX 3000 series still competes well in areas like rendering and cost. Users should choose based on their specific needs and budget⁶.

User Ratings and Community Feedback

When looking at reviews from users of the RTX 4000 and RTX 3000 series, we get a real sense of what people think. Their thoughts help us understand how satisfied they are and what they find valuable. It’s through their feedback that we see the full picture.

User Ratings

The general sentiment around the RTX 4000 series is positive. Many love the huge step up in performance due to impressive ray tracing features and CUDA cores. The RTX 4090 and RTX 4080, for example, both achieve high marks for their strength in computing. The specification praises don’t stop there. The RTX 4090’s 24GB GDDR6X and its quick 21 Gbps memory speed are highlighted as key reasons for such high ratings³.

Community Comments

Feedback from the community often dives deep into reviews and actual use cases. The comments on the RTX 3000 cover a wide range, reflecting a variety of experiences. Looking closer at the RTX 4000 discussions, especially those about using it for professional work, we see it excels in tasks like interactive design and VR. The Quadro RTX 4000 is picked out for the 8GB GDDR6 and its energy-efficient design, combining top-tier performance with good value⁹.

Below is a table summarizing the main features based on what we hear from users and the community:

Conclusion

The RTX 4000 and RTX 3000 series have different strong points. The RTX 4000 excels in technology with its high number of ray tracing and CUDA cores. Take the RTX 4090 for example, with 16,384 CUDA cores and 144 ray tracing cores. In comparison, the RTX 3080 has 8,704 CUDA cores and 68 ray tracing cores³. This means the RTX 4000 models are faster, especially in 3D and gaming, showing a huge improvement over the 3000 series¹⁰.

Speaking of gaming, our tests show the RTX 4070 slightly beats the RTX 3080 in some creative tasks by over 2%, but the 3080 is ahead in synthetic tests by 1.37%¹¹. For 4K gaming, the RTX 3080 wins, performing almost ten percent better than the 4070 on average¹¹. Yet, if saving energy is important to you, the RTX 4070 Ti uses less power at 285W than the 4090’s 450W³. This makes the 4070 Ti a good choice for long gaming or demanding tasks.

The price is also a key decision maker. The RTX 4070 was initially priced at $599 USD, which was less than the $699 USD for the RTX 3080. Plus, because of low supplies, the RTX 3080’s price has soared to over $900 USD¹¹. This makes the RTX 4070 a good option for top performance without breaking the bank. In the end, if you need a great GPU for gaming or work, the RTX 4000 series is packed with features and is a solid choice for almost anyone.

Source Links

1. https://technical.city/en/video/Quadro-RTX-4000-vs-Quadro-RTX-3000-mobile
2. https://www.jonpeddie.com/reviews/nvidia-introduces-its-new-editions-to-the-4000-series-line/
3. https://www.microcenter.com/site/mc-news/article/4000-series-breakdown.aspx
4. https://technical.city/en/video/Quadro-RTX-4000-mobile-vs-Quadro-RTX-3000-mobile
5. https://www.aime.info/blog/en/deep-learning-gpu-benchmarks/
6. https://www.videocardbenchmark.net/high_end_gpus.html
7. https://babeltechreviews.com/rtx-4090-performance-45-games-vr-pro-apps-benchmarked/
8. https://bizon-tech.com/gpu-benchmarks/NVIDIA-RTX-3080-vs-NVIDIA-RTX-3090/578vs579
9. https://aecmag.com/workstations/nvidia-quadro-rtx-4000-review/
10. https://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Nvidia-Quadro-RTX-4000-vs-Intel-HD-3000-Mobile-V1-1112-GHz/m716215vsm7646
11. https://www.techradar.com/versus/rtx-4070-vs-3080